Auteur(s) : Broghammer David
Directeur(s) : Vahlas Alexis
Date de création : 30-06-2013

Résumé(s) : Since the early 1990s the European Union uses systematically so called political conditionality in external agreements with its partners. While the number of such agreements multiplies dramatically, their dimensions in terms of implementation and real usage represents inconsistencies that can be identified also as part the EU s strategic acting. Such vagueness creates problems especially for small countries, where the Cotonou Agreement is the most comprehensive example to analyze. This work is interested in the perception of Cotonou s consultation procedure features, identifies and discusses various problems to argue finally that, despite being the most elaborated conditionality-tailored agreement, the Cotonou Agreement s clause presents several weaknesses. In regard to a more general view on applied or non-applied conditionality by the EU in the first part of this thesis we argument that incentive-based or less punitive approaches towards conditionality could be the more functional option for the European Union in the long run.
Discipline : Politiques européennes
Mots-clés libres : Accord ACP-UE de Cotonou Thèses et écrits académiques, 327.4, Aide économique européenne Thèses et écrits académiques, Pays de l'Union européenne Relations extérieures Thèses et écrits académiques
Couverture : FR